Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
D.C. Circuit Refuses To Rehear Blackwater Manslaughter Case - The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
The National Law JournalLegal Times and The National Law Journal have merged to bring you legal news from Washington and around the nation.Recent CommentsJoe on DOJ Official To Defense Bar: Stop Playing Games With EthicsDarren M. Meade on DOJ Official To Defense Bar: Stop Playing Games With EthicsMary on DOJ Official To Defense Bar: Stop Playing Games With EthicsJim Coleman on DOJ Official To Defense Bar: Stop Playing Games With EthicsJoe Jefferis on Obama: Consumer Chief Will Counter Corporate LawyersJoe Jefferis on Obama: Consumer Chief Will Counter Corporate LawyersJan Kleeman on Obama's Nominations Team Described as Insular, Lacking Energy Bubba on Obama's Nominations Team Described as Insular, Lacking Energy Divorce Lawyers on Jury Clears D.C. Divorce Lawyer in Malpractice CaseHow do I Win the Lottery on D.C. Lottery Whistleblower Suit Partially Survives Motion to DismissContributorsDavid Brown
Editor in ChiefDavid Ingram
Capitol Hill ReporterDiego Radzinschi
Photo EditorJenna Greene
Senior ReporterMarcia Coyle
Chief Washington CorrespondentMatthew Huisman
Legal Business Reporter Mike Scarcella
Justice Department ReporterTony Mauro
Supreme Court CorrespondentZoe Tillman
D.C. Courts ReporterGet the BLT on your IPhone
Legal Times on Twitterfollow me on TwitterFollow the editor on TwitterDavid Brown, editor in chief, The National Law Journal (and Legal Times)
CategoriesAssociate LifeBalancing ActBooksCrime and PunishmentCurrent AffairsD.C. Courts and GovernmentFilmFood and DrinkGamesJustice DepartmentJustice Department Laterals/HiringLawyers Who Do Bad ThingsLegal BusinessLobbyingMergersMiscellanyMusicOther CourtsPersonal FinancePoints of View Politics and GovernmentPolitics and Government ReligionSalariesScienceSociety and CultureSotomayor NominationSportsSupreme Court TelevisionTravelWar on TerrorWeb/TechWeblogsRecent PostsCharles Manatt, firm founder and former DNC chief, dies at 75Publisher Gets Probation In False Statements Case Dinsmore & Shohl Opens New Office in WashingtonSquire, Sanders Signs on to Represent Cleveland Contractor McTech Corp.Appeals Court Strikes Down SEC Proxy Access Rule The Morning WrapMaryland Attorney Suspended in D.C. After Failing to Disclose SuspensionAnita Hill Joins Plaintiffs Firm Cohen Milstein In D.C. Gibson, Dunn Appoints Two Litigation Partners to Head D.C. OfficeFinancial Services Group Criticizes Foley & Lardner Attorney Over Patent Reform IssueArchivesJuly 2011June 2011May 2011April 2011March 2011February 2011January 2011December 2010November 2010October 2010More...The Tip Jar Send us a tip or suggestion. Subscribe to this blog's feed? The Morning Wrap |Main| House Lawyers Denounce Decision on Legislative Privilege ?July 19, 2011D.C. Circuit Refuses To Rehear Blackwater Manslaughter Case
The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today said it will not review a panel's decision to revive the prosecution of former Blackwater private security guards charged in the shooting deaths of Iraqi civilians in 2007.
The nine active judges of the court issued an order today, without comment, unanimously rejecting the request from the guards that the full court review and overturn a three-judge panel decision in April. The panel decision remanded the case back to Washington federal district court for further proceedings.
The panel ruling reversed U.S. District Judge Ricardo Urbina’s decision in December 2009 to dismiss the indictment. Urbina concluded the government, in building its case, improperly used compelled statements the guards made in the hours and days after the fatal shooting in Baghdad. The judge said the indictment itself was tainted.
The D.C. Circuit panel--Senior Judge Stephen Williams and judges Merrick Garland and Douglas Ginsburg--instructed Urbina to determine the extent to which evidence was tainted as to each of the four remaining defendants. The guards were indicted in Washington federal district court in December 2008. The guards claim they acted in self-defense in the shooting, which left 34 civilians dead or wounded.
Lawyers for the guards said in their request for an en banc hearing that the panel ruling “creates a dramatic new burden for district courts” regarding the examination of the use of compelled statements in criminal prosecutions. The defense attorneys said the ruling would create “uncertainty and inequity” in this area of the law.
Responding to the Blackwater guards, the U.S. Justice Department in late June said in court papers in the D.C. Circuit that the full court should leave in place the panel ruling.
A Justice Department attorney, Demetra Lambros, acknowledged the split among federal appellate courts on whether the non-evidentiary use of compelled statements in prosecutorial decision-making is proper. The D.C. Circuit, Lambros said, sided with the courts that have refused to find indictments vulnerable because of their association to immunized statements.
Lambros said Urbina excluded in total “the testimony of key eyewitnesses to an unforgettably violent event” even though “whole swaths” of the testimony did not touch on the protected statements the guards made after the shooting. Urbina, Lambros said, “used a sledgehammer” and not a scalpel in assessing the prosecution for evidence of taint.
Lawyers for the guards were not immediately reached for comment this afternoon on whether they plan to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the D.C. Circuit panel decision.
Posted by Mike Scarcella on July 19, 2011 at 12:52 PM in Balancing Act, Crime and Punishment, Current Affairs, Justice Department, Legal Business, Politics and Government , Supreme Court , Travel, War on Terror | PermalinkDigg This | Save to del.icio.usTrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e201539004199c970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference D.C. Circuit Refuses To Rehear Blackwater Manslaughter Case :
Comments Verify your Comment Previewing your CommentPosted by: ?|?This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type: Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again. As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address
Invalid URL
Supreme Court Insider
Sign up for our e-newsletter all about the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s delivered every week to your mailbox and features exclusive news and analysis of the high court from The National Law Journal’s Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle. Advertisements
Featured Job Listings
TOP JOBSMORE JOBS >>
POST A JOB >>
Law.com NewswireAn Affiliate of the Law.com Network From the Law.com Newswire
Sign up to receive
Legal Blog Watch by email
View a Sample
Advertise & Subscribe with Legal TimesAdvertise with Legal TimesSubscribe to Legal TimesOther Blogs We LikeAbove The LawAlthouseBag and BaggageBeltway BlogrollConcurring OpinionsConfirmThemEvan Schaeffer's Legal UndergroundGavel GrabHow AppealingJURIST - Legal News and ResearchLean and Mean Litigation BlogLegal PadNLJ's L.A. Legal PadNuts & BoaltsOyez ProjectPrawfsBlawgSCOTUSblogTex ParteTexas Lemon Law BlogThe Am Law DailyThe CareeristThe Common ScoldThe SharkWrit LargeWSJ Law BlogBlog powered by TypePadIceRocket document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js'%3E%3C/script%3E"));COMSCORE.beacon({ c1: 2, c2: "6035669", c3: "", c4: "http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/07/dc-circuit-refuses-to-rehear-blackwater-manslaughter-case-.html", c5: "", c6: "", c15: ""});
没有评论:
发表评论