Financial Services Group criticizes Foley Lardner & lawyer about Patent reform issue

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Financial Services Group Criticizes Foley & Lardner Attorney Over Patent Reform Issue - The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
The National Law JournalLegal Times and The National Law Journal have merged to bring you legal news from Washington and around the nation.
Recent CommentsJoe on DOJ Official To Defense Bar: Stop Playing Games With EthicsDarren M. Meade on DOJ Official To Defense Bar: Stop Playing Games With EthicsMary on DOJ Official To Defense Bar: Stop Playing Games With EthicsJim Coleman on DOJ Official To Defense Bar: Stop Playing Games With EthicsJoe Jefferis on Obama: Consumer Chief Will Counter Corporate LawyersJoe Jefferis on Obama: Consumer Chief Will Counter Corporate LawyersJan Kleeman on Obama's Nominations Team Described as Insular, Lacking Energy Bubba on Obama's Nominations Team Described as Insular, Lacking Energy Divorce Lawyers on Jury Clears D.C. Divorce Lawyer in Malpractice CaseHow do I Win the Lottery on D.C. Lottery Whistleblower Suit Partially Survives Motion to DismissContributorsDavid Brown
Editor in ChiefDavid Ingram
Capitol Hill ReporterDiego Radzinschi
Photo EditorJenna Greene
Senior ReporterMarcia Coyle
Chief Washington CorrespondentMatthew Huisman
Legal Business Reporter Mike Scarcella
Justice Department ReporterTony Mauro
Supreme Court CorrespondentZoe Tillman
D.C. Courts ReporterGet the BLT on your IPhone
Legal Times on Twitterfollow me on TwitterFollow the editor on TwitterDavid Brown, editor in chief, The National Law Journal (and Legal Times)
CategoriesAssociate LifeBalancing ActBooksCrime and PunishmentCurrent AffairsD.C. Courts and GovernmentFilmFood and DrinkGamesJustice DepartmentJustice Department Laterals/HiringLawyers Who Do Bad ThingsLegal BusinessLobbyingMergersMiscellanyMusicOther CourtsPersonal FinancePoints of View Politics and GovernmentPolitics and Government ReligionSalariesScienceSociety and CultureSotomayor NominationSportsSupreme Court TelevisionTravelWar on TerrorWeb/TechWeblogsRecent PostsCharles Manatt, firm founder and former DNC chief, dies at 75Publisher Gets Probation In False Statements Case Dinsmore & Shohl Opens New Office in WashingtonSquire, Sanders Signs on to Represent Cleveland Contractor McTech Corp.Appeals Court Strikes Down SEC Proxy Access Rule The Morning WrapMaryland Attorney Suspended in D.C. After Failing to Disclose SuspensionAnita Hill Joins Plaintiffs Firm Cohen Milstein In D.C. Gibson, Dunn Appoints Two Litigation Partners to Head D.C. OfficeFinancial Services Group Criticizes Foley & Lardner Attorney Over Patent Reform IssueArchivesJuly 2011June 2011May 2011April 2011March 2011February 2011January 2011December 2010November 2010October 2010More...

The Tip Jar Send us a tip or suggestion. Subscribe to this blog's feed? The Morning Wrap |Main| Gibson, Dunn Appoints Two Litigation Partners to Head D.C. Office ?

July 21, 2011Financial Services Group Criticizes Foley & Lardner Attorney Over Patent Reform Issue

The Financial Services Roundtable, a group that represents 100 of the biggest U.S. financial institutions, raised concerns this week about Foley & Lardner after a firm lawyer authored an article that the group says is a betrayal to the firm’s clients.

The piece, penned by Washington-based Foley & Lardner partner Harold Wegner, highlighted comments made by former Chief Judge Paul Michel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit about a provision in a patent reform bill the House passed in June. One provision in the legislation, called Section 18, concerns business method patents, a class of patents that claims a new method of doing business.

Stephen Maebius, chair of Foley & Lardner’s intellectual property department, said the article came from an e-mail Wegner distributed restating Michel’s comments. The e-mail was not meant to represent the opinion of Wegner or Foley & Lardner, he said. Wegner couldn't be reached.

“These emails are meant to be an educational resource in which information is provided on issues and trends in the IP space,” Maebius said in a statement.

Judge Michel wrote that the Section 18 provision supports financial institutions “in several unjustified ways” and should be removed. He added that the provision would allow the invalidation of patents upheld by the courts, permit hold ups on lawsuits for years and put an additional burden on appeals courts.

Peter Freeman, a vice president of The Financial Services Roundtable, which supports the provision, said in an interview that the article is a “little disconcerting.”

The four-paragraph article by Wegner was titled, “Leahy-Smith ‘Big Banks Bailout’ SEC. 18,” and published July 11 in IP Frontline, an intellectual property and technology magazine. It draws heavily from Michel’s commentary. But Freeman said the piece is “more than just repeating Judge Michel’s critique of Section 18.”

“It is very concerning coming from a firm that many companies rely on to go to bat for them,” he said.

Freeman said Section 18 is beneficial to financial institutions. In a letter to Congress in June, his group, which is based in Washington, and other organizations, including the American Insurance Association, The Independent Community Bankers of America and Mortgage Bankers Association, wrote that the provision would protect financial firms from “meritless patent lawsuits brought by non-practicing entities.”

Foley & Lardner, which has received numerous honors for its intellectual property litigation, has represented U.S. Bancorp and Northern Trust in intellectual property cases. Both are members of the financial services group.

A spokesman for Northern Trust declined to comment. A U.S. Bancorp spokesman didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Posted by Andrew Ramonas on July 21, 2011 at 09:16 AM in Legal Business | Permalink

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d94869e2015433e4ea6a970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Financial Services Group Criticizes Foley & Lardner Attorney Over Patent Reform Issue:

Comments Verify your Comment Previewing your CommentPosted by: ?|?

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type: Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Post a comment Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Comment below or sign in with TypePad Facebook Twitter and more... You are currently signed in as (nobody). Sign Out (URLs automatically linked.)

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Name is required to post a comment

Please enter a valid email address

Invalid URL

Supreme Court Insider
Sign up for our e-newsletter all about the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s delivered every week to your mailbox and features exclusive news and analysis of the high court from The National Law Journal’s Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle. Advertisements



Featured Job Listings TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS >>

POST A JOB >>

Law.com NewswireAn Affiliate of the Law.com Network From the Law.com Newswire

Sign up to receive
Legal Blog Watch by email View a Sample

Advertise & Subscribe with Legal TimesAdvertise with Legal TimesSubscribe to Legal TimesOther Blogs We LikeAbove The LawAlthouseBag and BaggageBeltway BlogrollConcurring OpinionsConfirmThemEvan Schaeffer's Legal UndergroundGavel GrabHow AppealingJURIST - Legal News and ResearchLean and Mean Litigation BlogLegal PadNLJ's L.A. Legal PadNuts & BoaltsOyez ProjectPrawfsBlawgSCOTUSblogTex ParteTexas Lemon Law BlogThe Am Law DailyThe CareeristThe Common ScoldThe SharkWrit LargeWSJ Law BlogBlog powered by TypePadIceRocket document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js'%3E%3C/script%3E"));COMSCORE.beacon({ c1: 2, c2: "6035669", c3: "", c4: "http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/07/financial-services-group-criticizes-foley-lardner-attorney-over-patent-reform-issue.html", c5: "", c6: "", c15: ""});

View the original article here